A rewriting of Pygmalion from a female (and feminist) perspective: «Galatea» by Madeline Miller.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1721-4777/20629Keywords:
Miller , Myth, Ovid, Pygmalion, RetellingAbstract
In the context of contemporary publishing, which has witnessed the considerable success of the genre of female mythological retelling, Madeline Miller is a notable figure. Miller is an American author who has already published two novels and two short stories dedicated to rewriting episodes from classical mythology. The short story entitled Galatea represents a noteworthy reinterpretation of Ovid’s tale of Pygmalion from a feminist perspective. In contrast to the original narrative, which celebrates the power of art and the artist, Galatea becomes a narrative of violent love and possession. In this reimagining, the woman is positioned as subaltern and confined by her husband. The myth thus provides a foundation for elucidating the pervasively contemporary phenomenon of domestic violence. Galatea’s arduous pursuit of autonomy and freedom prompts the reader to reflect on the enduring relevance of classical narratives, despite their tragic persistence.
References
M. Altin, Aeaea is Revisited: Revisionist Mythmaking Strategies in Madeline Miller’s «Circe», «DTCF Dergisi», LX, 2020, 1, pp. 145-157.
A. Bayram, The Matter of Bodies: Ableist Bodies, Disablement and Disembodiment in Sylvia Plath’s «Lady Lazarus» and Madeline Miller’s «Galatea», «Journal of English Language», 2023, 1 pp. 1-13.
S. Braund, ‘We’re here too, the ones without names’. A study of female voices as imagined by Margaret Atwood, Carol Ann Duffy, and Marguerite Yourcenar, «Classical Receptions Journal», IV, 2012, 2, pp. 190-208.
A. Brown, Science fiction and classical reception in contemporary women’s writing, «Classical Receptions Journal», IV, 2012, 2, pp. 209-223.
F. Cox, Sibylline Sisters: Virgils presence in contemporary women’s writing, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011.
F. Cox, E. Theodorakopoulos, Homer’s daughters. Women’s responses to Homer in the twentieth century and beyond, Oxford-New York, Oxford University Press, 2019.
F.M. Cox, Metamorphosis, mutability and the third wave, «Classical Receptions Journal», IV, 2012, 2, pp. 163-175.
B. Dijkstra, Idols of perversity, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1986.
J. Elsner, Roman Eyes. Visuality and Subjectivity in Art and Text, Oxford/Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2007.
I. Fantappiè, Riscritture, in F. De Cristofaro (a cura di), Letterature comparate, Roma, Carocci, 2014, pp. 135-166.
M. Fusillo, Miti, temi, modi. Per una comparatistica transmediale, «Comparatismi», V, 2020, pp. 11-20.
L. Galasso, Ovidio. Le metamorfosi, Torino, Einaudi, 2000.
P.R. Hardie, Ovid’s Poetics of Illusion, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002.
P. Hardie, Redeeming the Text, Reception Studies, and the Renaissance, «Classical Receptions Journal», V, 2013, 2, pp. 190-98.
L. Hardwick, Reception Studies, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003.
L. Hardwick, C. Stray (eds.), A Companion to Classical Receptions, New York, Wiley, 2008.
L. Hardwick, S. Harrison (eds.), Classics in the Modern World: A ‘Democratic Turn’?, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013.
H. Hashim Jabbar, Analyzing the two main characters Galatea and the sculptor in Madeline Miller’s short story Galatea: a psychoanalysis approach, «World journal of advanced research and reviews» XVIII, 2023, 2, pp. 476-483.
E. Hauser, ‘There is another story’: writing after the «Odyssey» in Margaret Atwood’s «The Penelopiad», «Classical Receptions Journal», X, 2018, 2, pp. 109-126.
I. Hurst, ‘Love and blackmail’: Demeter and Persephone, «Classical Receptions Journal», IV, 2012, 2, pp. 176-189.
S. Judge, Contemporary Feminist Adaptations of Greek Myth, diss., Glasgow, 2022.
— Men make terrible pigs. Teaching Madeline Miller’s Circe and the new feminist mythic archetype, «The classical outlook», XCVIII, 2023, 3, pp. 108-118.
A.T. Kalloli, S. Tyagi, More Than Just an Oriental Goddess or an Occidental Sorceress: A Study of the Parallels in Select Feminist Retellings of Epics, «The International Journal of Critical Cultural Studies», XXIII, 2025, 1, pp. 23-36.
A. Laird Reception, in A. Barchiesi, W. Scheidel (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Roman Studies, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 349-368.
G. Liveley, Surfing the Third Wave? Postfeminism and the Hermeneutics of Reception, in C. Martindale, F. Thomas (eds.), Classics and the Uses of Reception, Oxford, Blackwell Publishing, 2006, pp. 55-66.
C. Martindale Redeeming the Text. Latin Poetry and the Hermeneutics of Reception, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993.
M. Miller, Galatea. A short story, New York, Harper Collins, 2022.
L. Nicolini, Apuleio. Metamorfosi. Volume due. Libri III-IV, Milano, Mondadori, 2023.
M. O’Hara, Circe and the Necessity of the Female Voice, «Parnassus: Classical Journal», IX, 2022, pp. 1-8.
N. Ranjith, Humanizing Circe, the Witch of Aiaia: A Novel that Projects the Repercussions of Patriarchal Supremacy. A feministic reading of the novel «Circe» by Madeline Miller, «International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences», VIII, 2023, 2, pp. 201-206.
J.D. Reed, Ovidio, Metamorfosi 5 (Libri X-XII), Milano, Mondadori, 2013.
M. Reinhold, The naming of Pygmalion’s animated statue, «CJ», LXVI, 1971, 4, pp. 316-319.
S. Renna, Il piacere dell’annientamento. Pavese, Leucò e il mito classico, diss., Bologna, 2020.
G. Rosati, Narciso e Pigmalione: illusione e spettacolo nelle Metamorfosi di Ovidio, Firenze, Sansoni, 1983.
R. Sarwar, S. Fatima, Madeline Miller’s «Circe»: A Feminist Stylistic Approach, «Perennial Journal of History (PJH)», III, 2022, 2, pp. 337-359.
M. Skinner (ed.), Rescuing Creusa: New Methodological Approach to Women in Antiquity, Lubbock, Texas Tech University Press, 1987.
V. Spacciante, Circe the female hero. First-person narrative and power in Madeline Miller’s «Circe», «Classical Receptions Journal», XX, 2024, pp. 1-14.
M.A. Struzziero, A New Voice for an Ancient Story: Speaking from the Margins of Homer’s «Iliad» in Madeline Miller’s «The Song of Achilles», «Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies», XXX, 2021, 1, pp. 133-152.
S. Stucchi, Da pietra a carne, da carne a pietra: riflessioni dalle «Metamorfosi» ovidiane, «Latomus», LXXI, 2012, 1, pp. 87-101.
E. Theodorakopoulos, Women’s writing and the classical tradition, «Classical Receptions Journal», IV, 2012, 2, pp. 149-162.
C. Wood, Reception and the Classics, in W. Brockliss, P. Chaudhuri, A. Haimson Lushkov (eds.), An Interdisciplinary Approach to the Classical Tradition, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 163-173.
V. Zajko, Women and Greek Myth, in R.D. Woodard (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Greek Mythology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 387-406.
— «What difference was made?» Feminist models of reception, in L. Hardwick, C. Stray (eds.), A Companion to Classical Reception, New York, Wiley, 2008, pp. 195-206.
— M. Leonard (eds.), Laughing with Medusa. Classical Myth and Feminist Thought, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Chiara Valenzano
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
